Re: Statistical inertia (was Statistica anova)

David Nichols (nichols@spss.com)
Thu, 8 Sep 94 13:47:27 EDT


In article <01HGTZIUYA5E9ANHE8@acad.fandm.edu>,
Richard S. Lehman <R_LEHMAN@ACAD.FANDM.EDU> wrote:

[ . . . ]

>Does anyone think they have a way out of this problem? Does anyone share my
>concern and interest in finding a way around this colleague/market dilemma?

I don't know that I have the answer, but I definitely am concerned with
the same problem. I think the answer would probably have to involve some
combination of two things: 1) Psychologists are going to have to come to
grips withe the fact that quantitative research is partly applied
mathematics; they're going to have to learn some math in order to be
competent to do research or to interpret it. I don't think there's any
way around that. 2) Quantitative types need to develop better ways to
integrate the mathematics with the topical substantive concerns.

Obviously, much easier said than done.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Nichols             Senior Support Statistician              SPSS, Inc.
Phone: (312) 329-3684     Internet:  nichols@spss.com     Fax: (312) 329-3668
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------