Re: [S] Challenge: does a faster simple bootstrap algorithm exist?

Jens Oehlschlaegel (oehl@Psyres-Stuttgart.DE)
Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:31:05 +0200 (MET DST)


On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Tim Hesterberg wrote:

> The two methods handle asymmetry and bias in diametrically opposite
> ways. Neither is particularly accurate. Alternatives include the
> bootstrap-t and BCa intervals.

The FDA draft on bioequivalence

http://www.fda.gov/cder/bioequivdata/index.htm

states that BCa intervals should not be used. Why is that? Is this
position widely accepted? Any pointers to literature?

Sorry for the non-S+ question

Best regards

Jens Oehlschlaegel

--
Jens Oehlschlaegel-Akiyoshi
Psychologist/Statistician

CURRENT ADDRESS (until 12/98) | PERMANENT VIRTUAL ADDRESS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/5663/ oehl@psyres-stuttgart.de | oehl@geocities.com +49 711 6781-408 (phone) | +49 711 6876902 (fax) |

Center for Psychotherapy Research | Christian-Belser-Strasse 79a | D-70597 Stuttgart Germany |

(general disclaimer)

----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu. To unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news