My hypothesis

From: Aaron Kilpatrick (aaron.kilpatrick@humber.ca)
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 21:04:21 EST

  • Next message: Andreea Ceausu: "essay due date and time"

    Here goes my attempt at an explanation, sorry for the length but I just copied
    this from my essay.

    I believe that Dizzard’s research involving automata prompted him to create a
    computer program that attempted to replicate the human mind. However this was a
    program like none before because it consisted of a level of complexity equal to
    that of a human. This complexity was created based on Dizzard’s passion for
    Godel and the elusive mechanical proof to a Godelian statement. Dizzard finally
    made the computer create, recognize and prove these statements over and over
    again. To achieve this Dizzard also made allowances for the inconsistencies
    that a Godel statement can prompt. These inconsistencies had a unique effect on
    the program and it began doing things on it’s own. The computer then presented
    Dizzard with a new (and previously unheard of) Godelian statement. The
    statement was based on a logical and believable proof of p implies true and not
    p implies true. Dizzard was so mesmerized by the statement that he fell into a
    coma as his mind traveled back and forth between the proofs. Others who came
    across his findings also succumbed to a trance because of the implausibility of
    it all.

    I tried to base my scenario on something said about the possibility of machines
    so complex we haven't even begun to design them yet and something Steprans said
    about DNA. I also tried to pull in that whole inconsistency thing where p = not
    p. And lastly imagined a new level of Godelian statement that a human could not
    prove.

    Of course it sounds far-fetched, but when you're starting with a story about
    people falling into comas from reading where else can you go. Hopefully no one
    will shoot too many holes in my idea, because I'm tired of reading about Godel
    and I don't think I can back to it again tonight.

    Aaron Kilpatrick

    ___________________________________________________________________
    This message was sent to the math3500 discussion list by "Aaron Kilpatrick" <aaron.kilpatrick@humber.ca> .



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 06 2004 - 21:02:10 EST