Re: Dizzard question

From: Jason Dong (kinezo@yorku.ca)
Date: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 01:52:59 EST

  • Next message: Juris Steprans: "Re: essay due date and time"

    Thats a very interesting point Mary.. sort of like humans accepting the
    unfavourable--false statements when considering both halves of a
    contradiction because the favourable--true statements cannot be found after
    numerous attempts.

    It may explain the statement made by Lucas that humans are not so much
    inconsistent, as we are falliable.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Mary Penwell" <metallic@yorku.ca>
    To: <math3500@mathstat.yorku.ca>
    Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 12:54 AM
    Subject: Re: Dizzard question

    > Although there may be some things too complex or difficult for the human
    > mind,
    > not necessarily a Gödel Statement but humans tend to just give up. Another
    > thing
    > to note is not every human can handle the same depth of thought as
    > another.
    > Every computer can handle the same level of 'thought' however the only
    > real
    > difference is how fast its processor is. The actual 'thought' level of
    > computers
    > has never changed.
    > ___________________________________________________________________
    > This message was sent to the math3500 discussion list by Mary Penwell
    > <metallic@yorku.ca> .
    >

    ___________________________________________________________________
    This message was sent to the math3500 discussion list by "Jason Dong" <kinezo@yorku.ca> .



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Dec 07 2004 - 01:53:17 EST