This article has been sent to all major and not-so-major newspapers in
Canada and the major English-language ones abroad. Keep your eyes open
in case it surfaces there and please let us at CCAFT know. It can be
reprinted without permission but please give the author full credit and=20
send us a copy of your publication.=20
(Mail to: P.O.Box 8052, Saskatoon, Sask.,S7K 4R7, Canada).

Marjaleena Repo, National organizer, CCAFT 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

BOMBING THE CRADLE OF CIVILIZATION

by David Orchard

So the nation with more "weapons of mass destruction" than any other
tells us to beware of Iraq.

The country which has done more invading than any in history warns,
"Iraq must be stopped."

Iraq "may" possess and "might" use chemical and biological weapons, says
the U.S. =97 which has used them repeatedly, from Vietnam to Cuba, and now
proposes to blow whatever amounts Iraq may have into the atmosphere,
with nuclear weapons if necessary.

Iraq is an "unpredictable rogue state," announces Washington, which in
1991 fired 900 tons of depleted uranium into Iraq, drenching it with
permanent, radioactive contamination.

Iraq is a threat to world peace, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair declare.
Did Iraq overthrow Guatemala's government, 1954? Attack Cuba and
assassinate Congo's prime minister, Patrice Lumumba, 1961? Invade the
Dominican Republic, 1965? Drop 10,000,000 tons of bombs, chemicals and
napalm on Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, 1965-1973? Overthrow and
assassinate Chile's Salvador Allende, 1973? Invade Grenada, 1983 and
Panama, 1989?

Saddam Hussein is accused of being a modern Hitler. How has a small,
virtually landlocked country, dependent on imported food and exports of
oil =97 both cut off by sanctions =97 publicly stripped of its weapons,
embargoed and guarded by a phalanx of the world's most advanced
weaponry, inspected 2,186 times over seven years, incapable of even
flying over its own territory, become equal to Nazi Germany?

War may come, our leaders say. How is war possible when only one side
has weapons? Is the operative word not massacre?

Iraq is a Third World country, smaller than the province of
Saskatchewan; its population is roughly 20 million with an average
income today, according to the New York Times, of $2 per month.

Devastated during the one-sided 1991 Gulf War =97 U.S. officials referred
to it as a "turkey shoot"=97 Iraq has since been bled white by seven years
of sanctions and embargo. Since 1991, over one million Iraqis have died
a slow starving death, (two-thirds of them children, making mockery of
the U.N. declaration on the Rights of the Child), and millions more are
suffering physical damage and drastically shortened lives. The majority
of the population is reduced to "semi-starvation," according to the
World Health Organization. Radiation-ravaged and deformed children are
denied any relief from their agony by an embargo harsher than that
imposed on Germany following World War II. The recent U.S. Bishop's
statement to President Clinton reads, "Epidemics rage, taking away
infants and the sick by the thousands..." The starvation of a population
is clearly prohibited by international law, even during war, yet under
this embargo a child is dying in Iraq every ten minutes.

Now Iraq faces another overwhelming attack by the world's superpower =97
and a few sycophantic spear-carriers, including Canada. This is not a
U.N. action. The Security Council has not authorized it and the U.N.
Charter does not authorize member states to take unilateral military
action.

In 1804, Haiti was the first Latin American country to achieve its
independence, through a slave revolt. The U.S., supported by Britain,
imposed a 60-year embargo on the island; it did not want slave rebellion
at home. For almost 40 years, Washington has embargoed Cuba and
attempted to assassinate its leaders. Independence in the Caribbean
continues to be an offence.

For 30 years the U.S. blockaded Vietnam. Vietnam's crime? It defeated
the U.S.A.

Now the U.S. refuses to lift the embargo against Iraq. Why?

Almost a century ago, Britain seized the Persian Gulf area, and carved a
border between Iraq and Kuwait =97 a division never accepted by Iraq and
renounced formally by it in 1961 after it overthrew the British-imposed
monarch and achieved independence. In the 1930s, Britain conceded the
entire oil reserves of the region to U.S. and British interests.

In the 1970s, Iraq nationalized (with compensation) its oil industry and
its citizens achieved a very high standard of living. In 1989, a high
power U.S. delegation visited Baghdad and demanded Iraq privatize its
oil industry. Iraq refused. Today Iraq stands in the way of complete
U.S. (and British) control of the oil resources of the Gulf.

In 1951, the Mossadeq government of Iran nationalized its oil. Britain
and the U.S. imposed draconian sanctions and two years later the U.S.
overthrew Mossadeq, calling him "that madman." In the early 1970s, Libya
nationalized its oil reserves and built impressive health, education and
construction projects in that once impoverished nation. President Nixon
publicly reminded Libyan leader Moammar Gaddaffi of Mossadeq's fate and
U.S. officials began referring to Gaddaffi as a "Hitler," a "terrorist"
and a "mad dog." In 1986, the U.S., supported by Britain, bombed Libya,
wounding Gaddaffi's wife, injuring all seven of his children, and
killing his infant daughter.

When Pierre Trudeau's government introduced the National Energy
Programme, 1980, with its goal of 50% Canadian ownership of the
industry, Washington, outraged, publicly warned that "relationships are
sliding dangerously towards crisis." U.S. officials, referring to the
1973 Chilean coup, spelled out a plan to topple Trudeau by
"destabilizing" Quebec and Ontario.

Now Ottawa has volunteered to help Washington unleash the world's most
horrendous weapons in an illegal and profoundly racist holocaust against
the defenceless citizens of the cradle of recorded civilization.

Call it privatization at the point of uranium-tipped missiles.

-----------

DAVID ORCHARD is the author of The Fight for Canada: Four Centuries of
Resistance to American Expansionism (1993) and the founder and chair of
the Citizens Concerned About Free Trade. He farms in Saskatchewan.=20
    -----------------------------------
He can be reached by telephone: (306)652-7095 (r)  (306)244-5757 (o), by
fax: (306)244-3790 and by e-mail at: ccafttor@sympatico.ca
website: http://web.idirect.com/~ccaft =20
National office (Saskatoon) tel: (306)244-5757  fax: (306)244-3790
Toronto office tel: (416)922-STOP  fax: (416)922-7883
Vancouver office tel: (604)683-FREE  fax: (604)683-3749